Dean Winchester: Sex God? [y/n circle one]

[holli]

So, brown_betty and I have been discussing whether Dean deserves his reputation as, I believe she put it, a 'viking in the sack.' And the conclusion we came to is that since he's always going from one-night-stand to one-night-stand, and he's so very pretty that he can get by on charm and the cuteness of his poor socialization, he might never have gotten the kind of feedback that is critical to being really, really good in bed. For that matter, I suspect he might be kind of lazy, because it's not like he's got any real *incentive* to improve, and most girls probably don't want to crush his fragile ego or anything.

Sam, unlike Dean, has actually been proven to be able to maintain a functional relationship, and is kind of an overachiever and perfectionist by nature. So it's possible that Sam, in fact, is the Winchester who deserves Sex God status around here-- he just doesn't advertise.

So all this wound up with me constucting a whole scenario wherein Dean finally convinces Sam to go home with some chick they meet in a bar, and Dean goes off with his own bar chick happy in the knowlege that his little brother won't be so damn uptight for a while. Dean has (he thinks) a good time, but the girl boots him out after a little while because she's got work in the morning, so he heads back to the motel to sleep, figuring Sam'll be along in a few hours at most.

But in fact, Sam doesn't roll in until like *noon* the next day, and he's *still got the girl with him*, and she's making big moony eyes at him and asking if he's sure he's got to get back on the road so soon. Which is just-- what the hell. Dean's world, it is turned upside down!

Anyway! On to the part that I am sure you find the most interesting, which is: which Winchesters do *you* think deserve Sex God status? I included all of them, just to be thorough.


[Poll #948806]

Comments

[derryderrydown.livejournal.com]

John trained Dean up right. Okay, maybe there were certain limitations, meaning that Dean's a lot better at going down on a man than a woman but John did the best he could with what was at hand.

[odditycollector.livejournal.com]

I protest your methodology! No respectable scientific journal will publish your results *now*!

*considers*

Unless you are actually measuring how convincing your arguments are? In which case I should like to see your control.

*sniffs haughtily*

[holli.livejournal.com]

Ah, but you see, this is an *opinion* poll. While input from those with first-hand experience relating to this weighty issue is of course welcomed, it is by no means required.

[odditycollector.livejournal.com]

Yes, but you are pressuring your sample group to join you in your dean demeaning, rather than reaping objective and unbiased opinions. Fight those journalistic tendencies!

[holli.livejournal.com]

I am merely raising the question of whether we as a group have, lacking first-hand experience, bought into Dean's press! It is a legitimate question.

The solution, clearly, is to find out for ourselves by having sex with as many Winchesters as possible. I think you'll agree that this will satisfy most objections.

[odditycollector.livejournal.com]

And take many scientific notes while doing so? Hmm. I think then the loser is the one with the *most* notes.

Perhaps we should tape the proceedings. For further study.

[holli.livejournal.com]

I am intrigued by your theories and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

[odditycollector.livejournal.com]

The Journal of Winchsters in the Sexual Studies?

(Or perhaps 'The Journal of Sexual Studes into Winchesters')

[minim_calibre]

See...

*cough*

My experience is that guys like Dean are actually pretty damn fun in the sack--they're the kind of guys who really *like* girls, and like to have fun with girls, and like to figure out how stuff works. No strings, no inhibitions.

You just, you know, don't want to keep them AROUND. Or tell them your real name.

[veejane.livejournal.com]

I was going to say -- especially when he (and then Sam) was still back in school, Dean was sticking around from one night to the next. If he expected to be able to get a different girl every night, then he had to be adept not just at giving her a good time (presumably word would get out if he were a lousy lay), but doing so in such a fashion that she doesn't go bananas two days later when she sees him sexin' up her best friend.

Which takes skillz, man. There is no-strings sexual congress and then there is hair-pulling at the Kwik-e-Mart, you know? (Okay, Dean might actually enjoy the latter, but it would negatively affect his gettin-some quotient in both short- and long-term.)

[susano.livejournal.com]

I think you need another option for John Winchester. That would be "Hell, yes!"